Mackenzie Dern vs Melissa Amaya
Head-to-head comparison — tale of the tape, career analysis, stylistic breakdown, and prediction factors
Mackenzie Dern
16-5-0Melissa Amaya
16-4-0Physical Comparison
Both fighters stand at 163cm — there's no height advantage for either fighter in this matchup.
Record & Experience
Mackenzie Dern brings a record of 16-5-0 across 21 professional bouts (76% win rate).Melissa Amaya enters with 16-4-0 from 20 fights (80% win rate).
Mackenzie Dern has the experience edge with 21 bouts compared to 20 — that's 1 more fights under the bright lights, which can matter in championship rounds when fatigue sets in and composure is tested.
In terms of finishing power, Melissa Amaya carries the heavier hands with a 38% stoppage rate vs 0% for Mackenzie Dern. Amaya is the more dangerous finisher of the two.
Age & Career Stage
Melissa Amaya is the younger fighter at 30 compared to Mackenzie Dern's 33 — a 3-year age gap. The younger fighter may have the edge in physical attributes, while Dern relies on veteran savvy and accumulated skill.
Key Factors
Dern's Path to Victory
- • Lean on greater experience (21 bouts)
- • Establish rhythm early and dictate the pace
Amaya's Path to Victory
- • Higher win percentage (80% vs 76%)
- • Apply pressure and force the fight on their terms
Mackenzie Dern vs Melissa Amaya — FAQ
- What are Mackenzie Dern's and Melissa Amaya's records?
- Mackenzie Dern is 16-5-0 (0 KOs). Melissa Amaya is 16-4-0 (6 KOs).
- Who is taller — Mackenzie Dern or Melissa Amaya?
- Both fighters stand 163cm tall — no height advantage either way.
- Who has the higher knockout rate?
- Melissa Amaya has the higher KO rate at 38% compared to Mackenzie Dern's 0%.