Matthew Allen Hughes vs Renzo Gracie
Head-to-head comparison — tale of the tape, career analysis, stylistic breakdown, and prediction factors
Matthew Allen Hughes
45-9-0
Renzo Gracie
13-7-1Physical Comparison
Renzo Gracie has the height edge at 178cm vs 175cm for Matthew Allen Hughes — a 3cm difference that gives Gracie the ability to fight behind range.
Record & Experience
Matthew Allen Hughes brings a record of 45-9-0 across 54 professional bouts (83% win rate).Renzo Gracie enters with 13-7-1 from 21 fights (62% win rate).
Matthew Allen Hughes has the experience edge with 54 bouts compared to 21 — that's 33 more fights under the bright lights, which can matter in championship rounds when fatigue sets in and composure is tested.
In terms of finishing power, Matthew Allen Hughes is the more prolific finisher with a 47% stoppage rate compared to 15% for Renzo Gracie. Hughes has shown the ability to end fights decisively.
Key Factors
Hughes's Path to Victory
- • Trust the higher win rate (83% vs 62%)
- • Lean on greater experience (54 bouts)
- • Establish rhythm early and dictate the pace
Gracie's Path to Victory
- • Use height and reach to fight at range
- • Apply pressure and force the fight on their terms
Matthew Allen Hughes vs Renzo Gracie — FAQ
- What are Matthew Allen Hughes's and Renzo Gracie's records?
- Matthew Allen Hughes is 45-9-0 (21 KOs). Renzo Gracie is 13-7-1 (2 KOs).
- Who is taller — Matthew Allen Hughes or Renzo Gracie?
- Renzo Gracie is taller at 178cm vs 175cm — a 3cm advantage.
- Who has the higher knockout rate?
- Matthew Allen Hughes has the higher KO rate at 47% compared to Renzo Gracie's 15%.