Mark Coleman vs Matt Hamill
Head-to-head comparison — tale of the tape, career analysis, stylistic breakdown, and prediction factors
Mark Coleman
16-10-0
Matt Hamill
12-8-0Physical Comparison
Both fighters stand at 185cm — there's no height advantage for either fighter in this matchup.
Record & Experience
Mark Coleman brings a record of 16-10-0 across 26 professional bouts (62% win rate).Matt Hamill enters with 12-8-0 from 20 fights (60% win rate).
Mark Coleman has the experience edge with 26 bouts compared to 20 — that's 6 more fights under the bright lights, which can matter in championship rounds when fatigue sets in and composure is tested.
In terms of finishing power, Matt Hamill carries the heavier hands with a 67% stoppage rate vs 44% for Mark Coleman. Hamill is the more dangerous finisher of the two.
Age & Career Stage
Matt Hamill is the younger fighter at 49 compared to Mark Coleman's 61 — a 12-year age gap. The younger fighter may have the edge in physical attributes, while Coleman relies on veteran savvy and accumulated skill.
Key Factors
Coleman's Path to Victory
- • Trust the higher win rate (62% vs 60%)
- • Lean on greater experience (26 bouts)
- • Establish rhythm early and dictate the pace
Hamill's Path to Victory
- • Look for the stoppage (67% KO rate)
- • Apply pressure and force the fight on their terms
Mark Coleman vs Matt Hamill — FAQ
- What are Mark Coleman's and Matt Hamill's records?
- Mark Coleman is 16-10-0 (7 KOs). Matt Hamill is 12-8-0 (8 KOs).
- Who is taller — Mark Coleman or Matt Hamill?
- Both fighters stand 185cm tall — no height advantage either way.
- Who has the higher knockout rate?
- Matt Hamill has the higher KO rate at 67% compared to Mark Coleman's 44%.