Jon Fitch vs Matthew Allen Hughes
Head-to-head comparison — tale of the tape, career analysis, stylistic breakdown, and prediction factors
Jon Fitch
32-8-2
Matthew Allen Hughes
45-9-0Physical Comparison
Jon Fitch stands 183cm tall compared to Matthew Allen Hughes's 175cm — a 8cm height advantage that could allow Fitch to control range and use the jab effectively.
Record & Experience
Jon Fitch brings a record of 32-8-2 across 42 professional bouts (76% win rate).Matthew Allen Hughes enters with 45-9-0 from 54 fights (83% win rate).
Matthew Allen Hughes has the experience edge with 54 bouts compared to 42 — that's 12 more fights under the bright lights, which can matter in championship rounds when fatigue sets in and composure is tested.
In terms of finishing power, Matthew Allen Hughes carries the heavier hands with a 47% stoppage rate vs 22% for Jon Fitch. Hughes is the more dangerous finisher of the two.
Key Factors
Fitch's Path to Victory
- • Use height and reach to control distance
- • Establish rhythm early and dictate the pace
Hughes's Path to Victory
- • Higher win percentage (83% vs 76%)
- • Greater professional experience (54 bouts)
- • Apply pressure and force the fight on their terms
Jon Fitch vs Matthew Allen Hughes — FAQ
- What are Jon Fitch's and Matthew Allen Hughes's records?
- Jon Fitch is 32-8-2 (7 KOs). Matthew Allen Hughes is 45-9-0 (21 KOs).
- Who is taller — Jon Fitch or Matthew Allen Hughes?
- Jon Fitch is taller at 183cm vs 175cm — a 8cm advantage.
- Who has the higher knockout rate?
- Matthew Allen Hughes has the higher KO rate at 47% compared to Jon Fitch's 22%.