Jim Miller vs Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick
Head-to-head comparison — tale of the tape, career analysis, stylistic breakdown, and prediction factors
Jim Miller
38-19-0
Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick
56-17-2Physical Comparison
Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick has the height edge at 185cm vs 173cm for Jim Miller — a 12cm difference that gives Kilpatrick the ability to fight behind range.
Record & Experience
Jim Miller brings a record of 38-19-0 across 57 professional bouts (67% win rate).Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick enters with 56-17-2 from 75 fights (75% win rate).
Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick has the experience edge with 75 bouts compared to 57 — that's 18 more fights under the bright lights, which can matter in championship rounds when fatigue sets in and composure is tested.
In terms of finishing power, Jim Miller is the more prolific finisher with a 18% stoppage rate compared to 5% for Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick. Miller has shown the ability to end fights decisively.
Key Factors
Miller's Path to Victory
- • Establish rhythm early and dictate the pace
Kilpatrick's Path to Victory
- • Use height and reach to fight at range
- • Higher win percentage (75% vs 67%)
- • Greater professional experience (75 bouts)
- • Apply pressure and force the fight on their terms
Jim Miller vs Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick — FAQ
- What are Jim Miller's and Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick's records?
- Jim Miller is 38-19-0 (7 KOs). Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick is 56-17-2 (3 KOs).
- Who is taller — Jim Miller or Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick?
- Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick is taller at 185cm vs 173cm — a 12cm advantage.
- Who has the higher knockout rate?
- Jim Miller has the higher KO rate at 18% compared to Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick's 5%.