Evan Tanner vs Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick
Head-to-head comparison — tale of the tape, career analysis, stylistic breakdown, and prediction factors
Evan Tanner
32-8-0
Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick
56-17-2Physical Comparison
Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick has the height edge at 185cm vs 183cm for Evan Tanner — a 2cm difference that gives Kilpatrick the ability to fight behind range.
Record & Experience
Evan Tanner brings a record of 32-8-0 across 40 professional bouts (80% win rate).Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick enters with 56-17-2 from 75 fights (75% win rate).
Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick has the experience edge with 75 bouts compared to 40 — that's 35 more fights under the bright lights, which can matter in championship rounds when fatigue sets in and composure is tested.
In terms of finishing power, Evan Tanner is the more prolific finisher with a 38% stoppage rate compared to 5% for Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick. Tanner has shown the ability to end fights decisively.
Key Factors
Tanner's Path to Victory
- • Trust the higher win rate (80% vs 75%)
- • Establish rhythm early and dictate the pace
Kilpatrick's Path to Victory
- • Use height and reach to fight at range
- • Greater professional experience (75 bouts)
- • Apply pressure and force the fight on their terms
Evan Tanner vs Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick — FAQ
- What are Evan Tanner's and Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick's records?
- Evan Tanner is 32-8-0 (12 KOs). Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick is 56-17-2 (3 KOs).
- Who is taller — Evan Tanner or Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick?
- Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick is taller at 185cm vs 183cm — a 2cm advantage.
- Who has the higher knockout rate?
- Evan Tanner has the higher KO rate at 38% compared to Kenneth Wayne Kilpatrick's 5%.