Advertisement
Advertisement

Chuck Liddell vs Francis Carmont

Head-to-head comparison — tale of the tape, career analysis, stylistic breakdown, and prediction factors

Chuck Liddell

Chuck Liddell

21-9-0
VS
F
🇫🇷

Francis Carmont

25-12-0
21-9-0
Record
25-12-0
70%
Win Rate
68%
62%
KO %
24%
188cm
Height
191cm
Reach
56
Age
44
Stance
30
Total Bouts
37

Physical Comparison

Francis Carmont has the height edge at 191cm vs 188cm for Chuck Liddell — a 3cm difference that gives Carmont the ability to fight behind range.

Record & Experience

Chuck Liddell brings a record of 21-9-0 across 30 professional bouts (70% win rate).Francis Carmont enters with 25-12-0 from 37 fights (68% win rate).

Francis Carmont has the experience edge with 37 bouts compared to 30 — that's 7 more fights under the bright lights, which can matter in championship rounds when fatigue sets in and composure is tested.

In terms of finishing power, Chuck Liddell is the more prolific finisher with a 62% stoppage rate compared to 24% for Francis Carmont. Liddell has shown the ability to end fights decisively.

Age & Career Stage

Francis Carmont is the younger fighter at 44 compared to Chuck Liddell's 56 — a 12-year age gap. The younger fighter may have the edge in physical attributes, while Liddell relies on veteran savvy and accumulated skill.

Key Factors

Liddell's Path to Victory

  • • Target early stoppage with heavy hands (62% KO rate)
  • • Trust the higher win rate (70% vs 68%)
  • • Establish rhythm early and dictate the pace

Carmont's Path to Victory

  • • Use height and reach to fight at range
  • • Greater professional experience (37 bouts)
  • • Apply pressure and force the fight on their terms

Chuck Liddell vs Francis Carmont — FAQ

What are Chuck Liddell's and Francis Carmont's records?
Chuck Liddell is 21-9-0 (13 KOs). Francis Carmont is 25-12-0 (6 KOs).
Who is taller — Chuck Liddell or Francis Carmont?
Francis Carmont is taller at 191cm vs 188cm — a 3cm advantage.
Who has the higher knockout rate?
Chuck Liddell has the higher KO rate at 62% compared to Francis Carmont's 24%.